William Kahn, regarded as the intellectual father of the
employee engagement movement, coined the term "personal engagement."
Personal work engagement is defined by him as "the harnessing of
organization members' identities to their work roles; through engagement,
people utilize and express themselves physically, cognitively, and emotionally
during role performances." (Bedarkar et al., 2013).
To understand the phenomena, Kahn identified three factors
that contribute to employee engagement as shown in the below diagram:
psychological safety, psychological meaningfulness, and psychological
availability (Bedarkar et al., 2013).
Figure 06: Kahn’s Model on Employee Engagement
Psychological Safety relates to employees' feelings of
being able to express themselves fully without fear of negative effects to
their self-esteem, position, or career. Employees who are psychologically safe
will try to incorporate components of their lives outside of work (e.g., other
work experiences, hobbies) into their jobs in a meaningful way (Allen, 2013).
Employees are Psychologically Available when they are
mentally safe and their job is important to them. As a result, psychological
availability refers to a circumstance in which employees draw on their entire
selves in a focused and integrated manner to improve their role performance. According
to Kahn, the more of ourselves we put into a character, the more thrilling and
comfortable it becomes (Bedarkar et al., 2013). Employees' "feeling of
possessing the physical, emotional, and psychological resources essential for
investing themselves in role performances" is referred to as psychological
availability. Employees who are psychologically accessible believe they are
capable of leading the physical, mental, and emotional efforts required to
complete their tasks (Allen, 2013).
Psychological Meaningfulness, according to Kahn
(1990), refers to employees' feelings of being valued, worthwhile, and able to
give of themselves in their workplace environment. (Allen, 2013).
Kahn (1990) claimed that specific psychological variables
must be satisfied in order to create sentiments of involvement among employees.
Employees must feel psychologically significant, safe, and available to fully
participate in their professional position, according to his idea of engagement
(Allen, 2013).
Kahn's model sheds important insights on the psychological
circumstances that mediate the relationship between work-related characteristics
and employee engagement (Rothmann, 2010).
References
Allen, J. A. and Rogelberg, S. G. (2013), Manager-Led Group
Meetings: A Context for Promoting Employee Engagement. [Online]. Available at https://sci-hub.hkvisa.net/10.1177/1059601113503040. Accessed on 5th May 2022.
Bedarkar, M. and Pandita, D. (2013). A study on the drivers
of employee engagement impacting employee performance. [Online]. Available at https://sci-hub.hkvisa.net/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.174. Accessed on 5th May 2022.
Padhi, B. and Panda, A. K. (2015). A Study on Employee
Engagement Models for Sustainability of Organisation. [Online]. Available at http://www.irdindia.in/journal_ijrdmr/pdf/vol4_iss4/13.pdf.
Accessed on 5th May 2022.
Rothmann, S. (2010) Factors associated with employee
engagement in South Africa. [Online]. Available at http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-07632010000200005.
Accessed on 5th May 2022.
No comments:
Post a Comment